Goldman Sachs estimated in 2023 that roughly 300 million jobs worldwide are exposed to automation by large language models. That figure, already striking, was calculated before autonomous AI agents (systems that go beyond text generation to take actions) entered the picture. The labor market disruption ahead is qualitatively different from anything in the industrial era, because for the first time, automation targets cognitive work rather than manual labor.
The speed of change is visible in a single role. In 2022, an event manager worked entirely by hand: brainstorming sessions, manual vendor research, individual emails to service providers. In 2023, ChatGPT entered as a support tool. The work became more efficient but not less. The manager had to develop new skills in prompt engineering and output verification, and the total scope of the role remained the same.
By 2024, the first autonomous agents appeared: AI systems with access to company databases that can draft communications, compare vendor proposals, and prepare decisions without step-by-step human instruction. The event manager's role shifted from executing tasks to coordinating agents (reviewing their outputs, making final decisions, handling exceptions). The underlying work did not disappear, but who performs it changed fundamentally.
Previous automation waves followed a consistent pattern: machines replaced manual labor, and displaced workers moved into cognitive roles. The mechanization of agriculture pushed workers into factories; factory automation pushed workers into offices. Each transition was painful, but there was always a higher-abstraction domain to absorb the displaced workforce.
AI breaks this pattern. It automates cognitive tasks directly: writing reports, analyzing data, drafting legal documents, generating code. The question that previous transitions never had to answer is now unavoidable: where do knowledge workers go when the knowledge work itself is automated? There is no obvious higher-abstraction tier waiting.
A significant fraction of knowledge work consists of solving the same problem repeatedly across different organizations. Every company writes its own onboarding materials, its own internal policies, its own project plans often reaching similar conclusions through redundant effort. AI can solve a problem once and deploy that solution at near-zero marginal cost, eliminating the inefficiency that currently sustains millions of jobs.
This is not inherently negative. Much of the work being eliminated is tedious and repetitive even if it is classified as "knowledge work." But the scale is unprecedented: when a single AI system can replace the redundant cognitive labor performed across thousands of organizations simultaneously, the displacement happens faster than retraining programs can respond.
Fully autonomous management agents (systems that can run a department with minimal human oversight) are plausibly 5 to 10 years away. The technology is advancing faster than the organizational willingness to adopt it, which creates a buffer. Regulatory uncertainty, liability concerns, and institutional inertia all slow deployment.
This gap between technical capability and actual adoption is the transition window. It is the period in which societies can restructure work arrangements, retrain workers, and rethink the assumption that full-time employment is the primary mechanism for distributing economic output. Whether that window is used productively is a policy question, not a technical one.
One plausible outcome is a revaluation of work that AI cannot do. If cognitive office work is automated, professions that require physical presence, manual skill, or deep human interaction (trades, caregiving, teaching, craftsmanship) may gain relative status and compensation. The four-day work week, currently a fringe proposal, could become an economic necessity if there is simply less cognitive work to distribute among the workforce.
The less optimistic scenario is a polarized labor market: a small class of AI-system operators and owners capturing most of the economic value, with a large displaced workforce lacking viable alternatives. Which outcome materializes depends almost entirely on institutional choices made during the transition window. These are choices about taxation, education, social safety nets, and the distribution of productivity gains.
AI is shifting knowledge workers from executing tasks to coordinating AI agents. In event management, for example, the role evolved from manual planning in 2022, to ChatGPT-assisted work in 2023, to orchestrating autonomous agents in 2024. The core competency is increasingly about directing and auditing AI systems rather than performing the underlying work.
Knowledge-intensive professions and cognitive tasks previously considered safe are the most exposed. Goldman Sachs estimated roughly 300 million jobs at risk from ChatGPT alone. Unlike earlier automation waves that targeted manual and repetitive work, AI threatens complex analytical and creative tasks.
Fully autonomous management agents are estimated to be 5 to 10 years away. While technical development is rapid, societal adoption takes longer. This gradual transition provides time for developing new work models and social safety nets.
AI could eliminate repetitive cognitive work, enabling shorter work weeks and more time for personal pursuits. There may be a renewed interest in craft and social professions as office work is automated. The opportunity lies in redesigning work around human strengths rather than simply replacing workers.
Previous automation waves displaced manual labor, and workers moved into cognitive roles. AI reverses this pattern by automating cognitive tasks directly, raising the question of where displaced knowledge workers can move when thinking itself is being automated.
New roles are emerging in AI system management, agent orchestration, ethical AI implementation, and human-AI interaction design. There may also be an increased valuation of human-centered and creative professions that resist automation.
.
Copyright 2026 - Joel P. Barmettler